Executive Summary
Encryption plays a critical role in data privacy and security by safeguarding online communications, enabling free speech, and protecting financial transactions, among other things. The Center for Cybersecurity Policy & Law, along with the vast majority of the cybersecurity community, believes weakening encryption would jeopardize the security, privacy, civil liberties, and vital social interests of every organization and individual.
While encryption protects individuals against crimes, like identity theft or unlawful surveillance, law enforcement and national security agencies argue that encryption makes it more challenging, or impossible, for law enforcement to investigate crimes and threats to public safety. Some argue, in the digital age, investigation necessarily requires digital evidence, including intercepted and decrypted communications related to public safety, terrorism, and child sex abuse materials (CSAM).
Opponents of encryption have framed this as a debate with two opposing sides, when we are actually united by a common cause against the same adversaries. Encryption protects everyone, including children and other vulnerable populations. Technology companies, including social media sites and messaging applications, do not want to be conduits to criminal activities or have illicit materials on their platforms.
The authors of this paper believe that it is time to rethink the conversation. As such, government and law enforcement must take a practical, incremental approach to policies and legislation that affect law enforcement and online security, rather than mandating ubiquitous surveillance that can circumvent encryption.
This paper will:
- Examine the historic discussion and arguments around encryption policy.
- Review recurring themes among proposals in the context of current policies and legislation.
- Establish how the modern encryption debate should proceed.
- Address the potential challenges should the discourse remain unaltered.
To download the paper in Japanese click here.
To download the paper in Korean click here.
To download the paper in Spanish click here.
To download the paper in Turkish click here.
Read Next
Securing Super Intelligence Requires Protecting Good-Faith Security Research
HPC encourages the Task Force to consider two priorities as it begins its work: (1) ensure its recommendations protect legitimate security research, and (2) directly engage with HPC and the security research community as key stakeholders.
Better Identity Coalition Releases Best Practices for Digital Credential Data Use
VDCs have the potential to improve security, privacy, usability, and inclusivity for individuals and businesses if they are designed, deployed, and used responsibly. However, the introduction of government-issued VDCs also carries the risk of eroding
Across the Atlantic, Cyber Policy Is Running Into the Same Terminology Problem
The report covers Europe’s cybersecurity industry, investment landscape, and evolving cyber posture, but it also spends considerable time on a more basic question: what actually counts as “offensive cybersecurity” in the first place?
