Executive Summary
Encryption plays a critical role in data privacy and security by safeguarding online communications, enabling free speech, and protecting financial transactions, among other things. The Center for Cybersecurity Policy & Law, along with the vast majority of the cybersecurity community, believes weakening encryption would jeopardize the security, privacy, civil liberties, and vital social interests of every organization and individual.
While encryption protects individuals against crimes, like identity theft or unlawful surveillance, law enforcement and national security agencies argue that encryption makes it more challenging, or impossible, for law enforcement to investigate crimes and threats to public safety. Some argue, in the digital age, investigation necessarily requires digital evidence, including intercepted and decrypted communications related to public safety, terrorism, and child sex abuse materials (CSAM).
Opponents of encryption have framed this as a debate with two opposing sides, when we are actually united by a common cause against the same adversaries. Encryption protects everyone, including children and other vulnerable populations. Technology companies, including social media sites and messaging applications, do not want to be conduits to criminal activities or have illicit materials on their platforms.
The authors of this paper believe that it is time to rethink the conversation. As such, government and law enforcement must take a practical, incremental approach to policies and legislation that affect law enforcement and online security, rather than mandating ubiquitous surveillance that can circumvent encryption.
This paper will:
- Examine the historic discussion and arguments around encryption policy.
- Review recurring themes among proposals in the context of current policies and legislation.
- Establish how the modern encryption debate should proceed.
- Address the potential challenges should the discourse remain unaltered.
To download the paper in Japanese click here.
To download the paper in Korean click here.
To download the paper in Spanish click here.
To download the paper in Turkish click here.
Read Next
Congress’ Proposed Chip Security Act Threatens to Create New Cyber Vulnerabilities in U.S. Semiconductors
As the U.S. races toward global AI dominance, a new bill aimed at preventing diversion of innovative U.S. semiconductors to China could inadvertently make those very same chips less secure.
Japanese Regulator Balances Cybersecurity, Competition Concerns In MSCA Implementation Guidelines
Promoting robust competition in the digital space while ensuring cybersecurity protections is challenging. The Japan Fair Trade Commission strikes a crucial balance between these priorities in its May 2025 guidelines.
The Clock’s Ticking: Why CISA 2015 Must Be Renewed Now
As the September 2025 expiration of CISA 2015 looms, Congress faces a critical decision that will shape the future of national cyber defense. At a time when the U.S. is under near constant cyber attacks, government and industry need to share intel.
